Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Cancerworld Magazine
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine > News > Harmful bacteria play greater role in predicting outcomes of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma
  • News

Harmful bacteria play greater role in predicting outcomes of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma

  • 4 March 2022
  • Janet Fricker
gut microbiome and Abiraterone response in prostate cancer
Harmful bacteria play greater role in predicting outcomes of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0

Harmful gut bacteria may play a greater role than beneficial bacteria in determining efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma patients. The study, published in Nature Medicine (28 February), found microbial signatures containing Lachnospiraceae species were connected to favourable anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti PD-1) clinical responses, while signatures containing Streptococcaceae species were connected to unfavourable responses.

The intestinal microbiome has emerged as a tumour-extrinsic predictive biomarker of immune checkpoint blockade efficacy. Administration of certain gut commensals has been shown to promote efficacy of anti-PD-1 in mice suggesting microbiota can affect immunotherapy outcomes. Furthermore, in two proof-of-concept trials, faecal microbiota transplanted from responders to non-responders overcame anti-PD-1 resistance in a third of melanoma patients. However, it has been unclear whether the microbiome exerts positive or negative effects on immune checkpoint blockade efficacy.

In the current collaboration, investigators from Oregon State University, the National Cancer Institute, the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research and the University of Pittsburgh performed a meta-analysis of microbial sequencing data from four published independent cohorts from Chicago, Dallas, Houston and New York of anti-PD-1 treated melanoma patients, together with a new cohort. The new Pittsburgh cohort involved collecting stool samples from 94 anti-PD-1 treated patients with melanoma before treatment or within four months of starting anti-PD-1.

Using a statistical modelling technique, known as transkingdom network analysis, the team identified distinct microbial signatures associated with specific immune-related adverse events, profiles and outcomes. They also explored whether the machine learning model could be trained on one cohort and then used to predict anti-PD-1 responses in a second cohort.

Key findings included:

  • Overall 27 distinct microbiotypes were identified.
  • Meta-analysis and other bioinformatic analyses of the combined data show that bacteria associated with favourable response are confined within the Actinobacteria phylum and the Lachnospiraceae/ Ruminococcaceae families of Firmicutes.
  • Gram-negative bacteria were associated with an inflammatory host intestinal gene signature, increased blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and unfavourable outcomes.
  • Favourable bacteria of the Lachnospiraceae family enhanced the immunostimulatory effects of anti-PD1 against cancer and self-antigens, while others dominated by Streptococcus spp induced organ pathology without enhancing immunity.
  • A year after treatment begins, the gut microbiota became a dominant factor in response to therapy, and then the microbes detracting from therapy played a larger role than the ones enhancing therapy.
  • Microbiotypes showed an unequal distribution across the five cohorts.
  • Machine learning trained by an individual cohort failed to predict response across the other cohorts, likely due to cohort heterogeneity and small size.

“Our findings shed new light on the highly complicated interaction between the gut microbiome and cancer immunotherapy response and set a course for future studies,” said Andrey Morgun, one of the investigators from Oregon State University College of Pharmacy.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • anti PD-1
  • immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)
  • immunotherapy
  • Lachnospiraceae species
  • melanoma
  • Microbiome
  • Streptococcaceae species
  • transkingdom network analysis
Janet Fricker

Janet Fricker is a medical writer specialising in oncology and cardiology. After researching articles for Cancerworld she runs, swims, and eats porridge.

Previous Article
  • News

Starting age for MRI breast screening defined for three genetic mutations

  • 2 March 2022
  • Janet Fricker
View Post
Next Article
  • Articles
  • Delivery of Care

Precision care: supporting our patients starts with asking them what they want and need

  • 4 March 2022
  • Simon Crompton
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Articles
  • News

CancerWorld issue #103 (May, 2025)

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 11 May 2025
View Post
  • News

Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 May 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Janet Fricker
  • 7 May 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 22 April 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 April 2025
View Post
  • News

Ovarian cancer: mechanism conferring resistance to immunotherapy revealed

  • Janet Fricker
  • 21 March 2025
View Post
  • News

Muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness improve survival in cancer patients

  • Janet Fricker
  • 20 March 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #101 (February 2025): The Must-Read Oncology Issue Returns to Print with Exclusive Interviews and Breakthroughs

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 18 March 2025
search
CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download or search in Cancerworld archive
Newsletter

Subscribe free to
Cancerworld!

We'll keep you informed of the latest features and news with a fortnightly email

Subscribe now
Latest News
  • CancerWorld issue #103 (May, 2025)
    • 11 May 2025
  • Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study
    • 8 May 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 7 May 2025
  • CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)
    • 22 April 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 8 April 2025
Article
  • A Vision for Cancer Policy in Europe: An Interview with MEP Nikos Papandreou
    • 12 May 2025
  • It’s no longer taboo to suggest that some metastatic breast cancers may be curable
    • 12 May 2025
  • (Re)Thinking Psycho-oncology in a world out of balance: What I learned after a year of interviews
    • 12 May 2025
Social

Would you follow us ?

Contents
  • Adrian Gottschalk: Making a Difference for His Fellow Human Beings
    • 10 May 2025
  • ACT for Children:A Global Initiative to Tackle Inequities in Pediatric Cancer
    • 10 May 2025
  • Miriam Merad and the 2025 Sjöberg Prize: A Celebration of Innovation in Cancer Immunotherapy
    • 6 May 2025
MENU
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About us
  • Articles
  • Media Corner
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Cancerworld is published by OncoDaily (P53 Inc.) | Mailing Address: 867 Boylston st, 5th floor, Ste 1094 Boston, MA 02116, United States | [email protected]

Archivio Cancerworld

Input your search keywords and press Enter.