Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Cancerworld Magazine
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine > News > Updated MINDACT results reveal chemotherapy benefit in some breast cancers varies by age
  • News

Updated MINDACT results reveal chemotherapy benefit in some breast cancers varies by age

  • 26 March 2021
  • Janet Fricker
Updated MINDACT results reveal chemotherapy benefit in some breast cancers varies by age
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0

Updated results of the MINDACT trial confirm that women with early-stage breast cancer, who were assessed to be at high clinical but low genomic risk for recurrence, and did not receive chemotherapy, continue to have excellent distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). The latest analysis, conducted at a median follow-up of 8.7 years, which was reported in Lancet Oncology (12 March), did however show, a small difference in outcomes according to age. While for women aged over 50 whose early breast cancers were clinically diagnosed to be high risk, but were found to have favourable genomic signatures, adjuvant chemotherapy did not deliver any benefits. In women aged less than 50 years, however, with a similar clinical and genomic risk assessment, adjuvant chemotherapy did confer a small benefit.

“Our findings will enable us to give individual patients better information about the risks and benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy, and allow them to play their part in making informed decisions on their treatment,” says Martine Piccart, the Principal Investigator from Institut Jules Bordet (Brussels, Belgium).

While cytotoxic agents and targeted drugs (e.g. endocrine and anti-HER2 agents) have been instrumental in eradicating micro metastases in breast cancer, there have been concerns around side effects and financial costs. The phase III MINDACT study, which took place in 112 institutions across nine European countries, set out to explore whether women found to have high clinical risks, but low genomic risks, could safely forgo chemotherapy. The investigators used MammaPrint, a genomic test analysing activity levels of 70 genes, to calculate risk of recurrence.

Between 2007 and 2011, 6,693 women, aged 18 to 70 years with histologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer (stage T1, T2, or operable T3), with up to three positive lymph nodes, no distant metastases, and a WHO performance status 0‒1, had their genomic risk assessed using MammaPrint and their clinical risk assessed using a modified version of Adjuvant! Online.

Women at low clinical and low genomic risk received no chemotherapy; those at high risk both clinically and genomically received chemotherapy; and patients with high clinical risk and low genomic risk were randomised to receive chemotherapy (n=749) or not (n=748). After a median follow-up of five years, the primary analysis, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2016, showed patients classified as at high clinical risk and low genomic risk who did not receive chemotherapy had a five-year DMFS of 94.7%. “The majority of women in MINDACT had luminal breast cancer that was hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, and known to have a substantial risk of relapse between five and 10 years. This made it important to undertake a second analysis,” Piccart told Cancer World.

Results of the latest analysis showed that, for the 1,497 women who were at high clinical but low genomic risk, DMFS at eight years was 92.0% for those receiving chemotherapy versus 89.4% for those not receiving chemotherapy (HR=0.66; 95%CI 89.6‒93.8). When stratifying by age, investigators found for women over 50 there was no difference in DMFS between women who received adjuvant chemotherapy and women who did not, but for women aged 50 years or younger, a 5% benefit was found for DMFS, favouring those receiving chemotherapy.

The most likely explanation for the enhanced chemotherapy effect seen in younger women, write the authors, is the indirect endocrine effect that occurs through suppression of ovarian function by chemotherapy. Suppression of ovarian function as the mechanism for the beneficial effect is supported by recent subgroup analyses of the TAILORx  trial, which found no benefit from chemotherapy in the very young women in whom chemotherapy did not induce ovarian function suppression. “This suggests that if young women in the two trials had received a ‘strong endocrine’ therapy no chemotherapy benefit would have been observed,” says Piccart.

Regarding treatment of young women, Piccart says, “If the signature comes back low risk, the clinician needs to counsel them. If they don’t want to take any risks, they should have chemotherapy, but if they’re reluctant to have chemotherapy we can discuss alternative options like stronger endocrine treatments.” Such treatments, she adds, could include combining LH analogues with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor.

The latest MINDACT results, Piccart hopes, will inspire more health authorities to prioritise reimbursement of MammaPrint. “Many European countries still don’t reimburse MammaPrint, with the result that women are being denied the possibility to avoid unnecessary chemotherapy, and in consequence are being exposed to long term side effects,” she says.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • breast cancer
  • Mammaprint
  • MINDACT
  • personalised medicine
Janet Fricker

Janet Fricker is a medical writer specialising in oncology and cardiology. After researching articles for Cancerworld she runs, swims, and eats porridge.

Previous Article
  • Articles
  • Medicine

Can gene therapy be made to work against solid tumours?

  • 25 March 2021
  • Rachel Brazil
View Post
Next Article
  • Obituaries

José Baselga: A giant of medical oncology

  • 26 March 2021
  • Marc Beishon
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News

Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 May 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 7 May 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 22 April 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 April 2025
View Post
  • News

Ovarian cancer: mechanism conferring resistance to immunotherapy revealed

  • Janet Fricker
  • 21 March 2025
View Post
  • News

Muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness improve survival in cancer patients

  • Janet Fricker
  • 20 March 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #101 (February 2025): The Must-Read Oncology Issue Returns to Print with Exclusive Interviews and Breakthroughs

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 18 March 2025
View Post
  • News

Low-dose aspirin reduces colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with PI3K alterations

  • Janet Fricker
  • 6 March 2025
search
CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download or search in Cancerworld archive
Newsletter

Subscribe free to
Cancerworld!

We'll keep you informed of the latest features and news with a fortnightly email

Subscribe now
Latest News
  • Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study
    • 8 May 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 7 May 2025
  • CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)
    • 22 April 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 8 April 2025
  • Ovarian cancer: mechanism conferring resistance to immunotherapy revealed
    • 21 March 2025
Article
  • Miriam Merad and the 2025 Sjöberg Prize: A Celebration of Innovation in Cancer Immunotherapy
    • 6 May 2025
  • Istanbul, Ankara take action on HPV vaccination, as government delays promised national programme
    • 1 April 2025
  • Could this dual approach be the frontier that finally gets immunotherapy to work for MSS colorectal cancer?
    • 31 March 2025
Social

Would you follow us ?

Contents
  • Miriam Merad and the 2025 Sjöberg Prize: A Celebration of Innovation in Cancer Immunotherapy
    • 6 May 2025
  • “I really care about people.” – Philip Kantoff, A Life in Science and Medicine
    • 5 May 2025
  • What If the World’s Leading Prostate Cancer Epidemiologist Opened a Restaurant? A Conversation with Lorelei Mucci- A Harvard Scientist, A Mother, A Leader
    • 23 April 2025
MENU
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About us
  • Articles
  • Media Corner
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Cancerworld is published by OncoDaily (P53 Inc.) | Mailing Address: 867 Boylston st, 5th floor, Ste 1094 Boston, MA 02116, United States | [email protected]

Archivio Cancerworld

Input your search keywords and press Enter.