Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Cancerworld Magazine
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine > News > Drop in metastatic breast cancer mortality ‘greater than expected’
  • News

Drop in metastatic breast cancer mortality ‘greater than expected’

  • 9 February 2024
  • Janet Fricker
Drop in metastatic breast cancer mortality ‘greater than expected’
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0

Between 1975 and 2019 breast cancer deaths dropped by 58% due to a combination of screening mammography and improved treatment. The US modelling study published in JAMA, 16th January 2024, found that by 2019 nearly one third of the decrease could be attributed to advances in treating metastatic breast cancer.

“What really surprised us was that the relative contribution of metastatic treatment to reductions in calendar-year-specific breast cancer deaths was larger than we had anticipated,” Sylvia Plevritis, the corresponding author of the study, tells Cancerworld.

The research represents the first time the relative contributions of screening mammography, early-stage treatment and metastatic treatment on breast cancer mortality have been quantified. “The results will help to identify gaps in care where we need to guide future cancer control interventions to make the biggest difference to survivorship,” says Plevritis, Chair of the Department of Biomedical Data Science at Stanford University School of Medicine.

The current paper is the third in a trio of papers from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modelling Network (CISNET), established in 2000 by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) to understand the impact of cancer surveillance, screening and treatment on cancer incidence and mortality. Using simulation modelling, the CISNET investigators previously reported in N Engl J Med in 2005 and JAMA in 2018 that improvements in breast cancer screening and therapy for stage I to III breast cancer between 1975 and 2012 in the US were associated with reduction in breast cancer mortality. However, the association between changes in metastatic breast cancer treatment and improved breast cancer mortality has been unclear.

For the current study, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the investigators used updated CISNET models to estimate the associations of stage I–III and metastatic breast cancer treatments and screening mammography with age-adjusted breast cancer mortality rates in the US between 1975 and 2019 for women aged 30 to 79 years. Deaths due to breast cancer overall and by oestrogen receptor (ER) and ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status were simulated.

The team used four computer breast cancer simulation models: model D (developed by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), model M (MD Anderson Cancer Center), model S (Stanford University), and model W (University of Wisconsin-Harvard). Each model used a distinct approach, formulated through microsimulation or analytic framework or a combination of both, with data then validated against clinical trials. “Breast cancer is a very heterogenous disease with many different subtypes. Models allow us to understand what effects different types of treatment have on mortality for different subtypes across the continuum of breast cancer care,” explains Plevritis.

Altogether, the study involved data from 82,252 breast cancer patients (including 7,740 with metastatic disease) obtained from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Outcomes (NCCNO) database.

By the end of 2019, the study showed a 58% decline in US breast cancer mortality, with 29% attributed to metastatic breast cancer; 47% to treatment of stage I–III breast cancer; and 25% to screening mammography.

Based on simulations, the greatest change in survival following metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (model range, 1.0–2.7 years) to 3.2 years (model range, 2.0–4.9 years).

Survival time varied according to subgroup status. Patients with ER positive and ERBB2 positive cancers saw an average increase in survival times of 2.5 years between 2000 and 2019. Those with ER positive and ERBB2 negative cancers lived an average of 1.6 years longer; while those who were ER negative and ERBB2 negative lived an average of 0.5 years longer.

“The largest mortality reduction from screening and treatment collectively was estimated in ER+/ERBB2+ breast cancer; and the smallest, in ER–/ERBB2– breast cancer. Similarly, the largest improvement in survival after metastasis was estimated in ER+/ERBB2+ disease; and the smallest, in ER–/ERBB2– disease. These differences may reflect the efficacy of targeted treatments of ER+ and ERBB2+ cancers,” write the authors.

In the next iteration of the model, the team are introducing neoadjuvant chemotherapy to understand the mortality effects of giving breast cancer patients drugs prior to surgery. Other CISNET projects are modelling mortality in bladder, cervical, colorectal, oesophageal, gastric, lung, prostate and uterine cancers and multiple myeloma.

In an accompanying editorial Stephanie Wheeler (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Gabrielle Rocque (University of Alabama at Birmingham), and Ethan Basch (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), write, “Models such as those developed by CISNET investigators serve as an essential tool to help clarify and quantify for decision-makers the population health return on decades-long investments in research, clinical care, and public health programming.”

However, there remain individuals with rapid disease progression who do not respond to current therapies and those with higher mortality rates without adequate treatment options, such as triple-negative cancers. “Resources should be committed toward achieving advances across the continuum of disease and with particular attention to populations that face unequal care outcomes to ensure that benefits of innovation reach all patients,” they write.

A limitation of the study, add the editorialists, was lack of evaluation of subpopulation-specific estimates in marginalised populations (such as rural, Black, and uninsured patients), who continue to experience poorer breast cancer outcomes. “Future modelling work should evaluate how changes in screening and treatment affect care and outcome disparities across subpopulations to inform research and implementation planning as well as intervention and policies to help address gaps and improve equity,” they write.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • breast cancer death
  • breast cancer mortality
  • cancer health disparities
  • computer simulation models
  • metastatic breast cancer
  • progress
Janet Fricker

Janet Fricker is a medical writer specialising in oncology and cardiology. After researching articles for Cancerworld she runs, swims, and eats porridge.

Previous Article
  • Articles
  • Policy

Not just a climate issue: cutting cancer rates through cleaner cooking fuels in Africa

  • 9 February 2024
  • Esther Nakkazi
View Post
Next Article
  • Obituaries

John Ryan: a true public health champion

  • 13 February 2024
  • Anna Wagstaff
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News

Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 May 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 7 May 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 22 April 2025
View Post
  • News
  • Senza categoria

What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments

  • Janet Fricker
  • 8 April 2025
View Post
  • News

Ovarian cancer: mechanism conferring resistance to immunotherapy revealed

  • Janet Fricker
  • 21 March 2025
View Post
  • News

Muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness improve survival in cancer patients

  • Janet Fricker
  • 20 March 2025
View Post
  • News

CancerWorld #101 (February 2025): The Must-Read Oncology Issue Returns to Print with Exclusive Interviews and Breakthroughs

  • Yeva Margaryan
  • 18 March 2025
View Post
  • News

Low-dose aspirin reduces colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with PI3K alterations

  • Janet Fricker
  • 6 March 2025
search
CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download CancerWorld #101 Download or search in Cancerworld archive
Newsletter

Subscribe free to
Cancerworld!

We'll keep you informed of the latest features and news with a fortnightly email

Subscribe now
Latest News
  • Personalised neoantigen vaccine for kidney cancer shows promise in phase 1 study
    • 8 May 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in April: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 7 May 2025
  • CancerWorld #102 (April 2025)
    • 22 April 2025
  • What Caught Our Eye in March: Oncology’s Top Moments
    • 8 April 2025
  • Ovarian cancer: mechanism conferring resistance to immunotherapy revealed
    • 21 March 2025
Article
  • Miriam Merad and the 2025 Sjöberg Prize: A Celebration of Innovation in Cancer Immunotherapy
    • 6 May 2025
  • Istanbul, Ankara take action on HPV vaccination, as government delays promised national programme
    • 1 April 2025
  • Could this dual approach be the frontier that finally gets immunotherapy to work for MSS colorectal cancer?
    • 31 March 2025
Social

Would you follow us ?

Contents
  • Miriam Merad and the 2025 Sjöberg Prize: A Celebration of Innovation in Cancer Immunotherapy
    • 6 May 2025
  • “I really care about people.” – Philip Kantoff, A Life in Science and Medicine
    • 5 May 2025
  • What If the World’s Leading Prostate Cancer Epidemiologist Opened a Restaurant? A Conversation with Lorelei Mucci- A Harvard Scientist, A Mother, A Leader
    • 23 April 2025
MENU
  • About the Magazine
    • About us
    • Editorial Team
    • Events
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
  • ESCO Corner
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About us
  • Articles
  • Media Corner
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Cancerworld is published by OncoDaily (P53 Inc.) | Mailing Address: 867 Boylston st, 5th floor, Ste 1094 Boston, MA 02116, United States | [email protected]

Archivio Cancerworld

Input your search keywords and press Enter.