Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnership
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
NEWSLETTER  |  PRINT VERSION
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Cancerworld Magazine
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnership
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
Cancerworld Magazine > News > The misuse of “noninferiority” in presenting trials is often misleading
  • News

The misuse of “noninferiority” in presenting trials is often misleading

  • 11 May 2020
  • Elena Riboldi
The misuse of “noninferiority” in presenting trials is often misleading
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0

When researchers have the opportunity to present their trials at medical meetings, they tend to use not-negative conclusions to discuss formally negative results. A research published in JAMA Oncology by a group of Italian oncologists from the University of Turin and the National Cancer Institute – “Fondazione G. Pascale”, Naples, shows that one third of oral presentations about phase 3 trials that failed to demonstrate the efficacy of an experimental treatment had not-negative conclusions. Of note, those abstracts were presented at two of the most important international oncology meetings, the ASCO and the ESMO annual meetings.

“We believe that more attention should be paid to the statements included in the conclusions of oral presentations at meetings, and the discussants’ role is crucial. When the primary end point is not met, the word negative should be explicitly used”, Massimo Di Maio and Francesco Perrone, supervisors of the study, wrote. Meetings are a privileged occasion to reach not only the scientific community, but also the general public, through the lay press and the media, and the risk of sending out messages that are not completely justified by data is real.

Authors selected 208 oral communications about phase 3 clinical studies presented at the ASCO and the ESMO annual meetings in the past three years. They identified 91 negative trials, i.e. studies where the primary endpoint of efficacy was not met. Conclusions were considered to be not-negative when, more or less explicitly, authors consider the possibility of using the experimental treatment in that setting, without making clear statements about the study negativity.

Of the 91 negative studies, 26 (29%) had a not-negative conclusion. The proportion of negative studies with not-negative conclusions was 22% in 2017, 13% in 2018, and 47% in 2019. Interestingly, the proportion was similar in nonprofit and for-profit studies (30% and 26%, respectively). In 7 cases (27%), authors interpreted post hoc the study as a noninferiority design.

“When a trial is designed to test the superiority of an experimental treatment, post hoc interpretation of noninferiority is methodologically debatable” the authors remarked. “The noninferiority hypothesis should be prospectively planned, with a clear definition of the margin acceptable to define noninferiority.”

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • clinical trials
  • noninferiority
  • not negative
  • oral presentations
  • resultsù
Elena Riboldi

Previous Article
  • Voices

Delivering cancer care during the pandemic in Europe’s most overstretched health system

  • 10 May 2020
  • Geta Roman
View Post
Next Article
  • News

Hormone therapy for prostate cancer may shield from COVID-19

  • 18 May 2020
  • Elena Riboldi
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News

Multicomponent prevention strategy reduces risk of cancer

  • Janet Fricker
  • 20 May 2022
View Post
  • News

Lumpectomy as effective as mastectomy in young breast cancer patients

  • Janet Fricker
  • 13 May 2022
View Post
  • News

Multi organ chip could facilitate personalised cancer therapy 

  • Janet Fricker
  • 12 May 2022
View Post
  • News

100,000 Genomes Project pinpoints new cancer genetic culprits

  • Janet Fricker
  • 29 April 2022
View Post
  • News

IL-6 provides missing link between exercise and colon cancer protection

  • Janet Fricker
  • 28 April 2022
View Post
  • News

CAR T-cell therapy shows efficacy in solid tumours

  • Janet Fricker
  • 20 April 2022
View Post
  • News

No link between brain tumours and ‘usual’ use of mobile phones

  • Janet Fricker
  • 14 April 2022
View Post
  • News

Radiologists urged to report breast arterial calcification for CVD prevention

  • Janet Fricker
  • 30 March 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

search
or search in Cancerworld archive
Newsletter

Subscribe free to
Cancerworld!

We'll keep you informed of the latest features and news with a fortnightly email

Subscribe now
Latest News
  • Multicomponent prevention strategy reduces risk of cancer
    • 20 May 2022
  • Lumpectomy as effective as mastectomy in young breast cancer patients
    • 13 May 2022
  • Multi organ chip could facilitate personalised cancer therapy 
    • 12 May 2022
  • 100,000 Genomes Project pinpoints new cancer genetic culprits
    • 29 April 2022
  • IL-6 provides missing link between exercise and colon cancer protection
    • 28 April 2022
Article
  • What can we expect from mRNA cancer vaccines?
    • 13 May 2022
  • Sri Lanka cancer care hit by foreign currency crisis
    • 6 May 2022
  • From social determinants to cancer outcomes: the cell biology behind the disparities
    • 29 April 2022
Latest printed issue
Social

Would you follow us ?

Contents
  • Message from a Ukrainian oncologist: Please prioritise my patients ‒ if you don’t who will?
    • 19 April 2022
  • Pandemics, War, Reconstruction and the Duty of Medicine and Science
    • 4 April 2022
  • Crisis in the Ukraine: we can help by doing what we do best
    • 4 March 2022
MENU
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnership
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
  • Articles
  • Media Corner
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Cancerworld is funded by SPCC Sharing Progress in Cancer Care | Piazza Indipendenza 2, 6500 Bellinzona - Switzerland | info@spcc.net

Archivio Cancerworld

Input your search keywords and press Enter.