Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnerships
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Cancerworld Magazine
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnerships
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
Cancerworld Magazine > News > Fit, susceptible, or frail? Updated recommendations for managing breast cancer in older people
  • News

Fit, susceptible, or frail? Updated recommendations for managing breast cancer in older people

  • 20 May 2021
  • Janet Fricker
Senior woman having a mammography scan at hospital
Fit, susceptible, or frail? Updated recommendations for managing breast cancer in older people
Total
54
Shares
54
0
0
0
0

Management of breast cancer in older women should include routine use of geriatric assessments. Recommendations from an updated multidisciplinary taskforce, which includes members of the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists and International Society of Geriatric Oncology, published in Lancet Oncology (14 May), underline the importance of considering heterogeneity in older breast cancer patients. The international authors stress functional age (as opposed to chronological age) and any underlying frailty, should play major roles in decision-making for this population.

“In the context of the limited applicability of the evidence generated in younger or more fit individuals, patient preferences, life expectancy, predicted survival benefits, and effect on anticancer therapy toxicity and quality of life should be carefully considered in decision making,” conclude the authors, led by Laura Biganzoli, from Hospital of Prato, Italy.

Breast cancer prevalence among older women (≥70 years) is increasing. The higher cancer mortality experienced by older versus younger patients represents a major health disparity that could be explained by advanced presentation, delayed diagnosis, organ function decline, and presence of co-morbidities. Older patients can also be under-represented in clinical trials, emphasising the need to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of anticancer therapy in this population. The multidisciplinary taskforce behind this study ‒ which includes specialists in medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, geriatrics, radiology, and epidemiology, as well as patient advocates ‒ was established in 2007 to prepare recommendations for management of breast cancer in older women, with the current publication representing their latest update.

Screening for frailty in women aged 70 years and older, recommend the authors, is needed to identify those at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Stratifying patients as ‘fit, susceptible, or frail’, they write, can recognise those at risk of complications. “Similar to younger patients, fit older individuals can tolerate standard treatment. Susceptible individuals can require treatment adjustment and geriatric interventions,” they write. Competing mortality risks, add the authors, can justify less aggressive approaches. “Decisions should consider not only the risk of breast cancer recurrence, but also the risk of dying of other causes, which is strongly affected by frailty.”

Since geriatric assessment can be time consuming and may not be necessary for all older patients, the authors recommend in the first instance use of toxicity calculators, such as the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) Chemo-Toxicity Calculator and the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-age (CRASH) scores, to estimate risks of grade 3‒5 chemotherapy toxicity. Such scales, they stress, should not be used as the sole factor to determine whether older women should receive chemotherapy, but rather as adjuncts to decision making.
The latest recommendations for management of older women were also expanded to include:

  • Cultural and social consideration. In multicultural societies, engagement with the patient’s social and cultural community is considered an important factor in improving outcomes for patients and care givers.
  • Surveillance imaging. Biennial screening mammography for women aged 70‒75 years, with mammography is considered unlikely to provide benefit after 75 years.
  • Genetic screening. Genetic testing should take place regardless of age, since it may have relevant implications for therapeutic decisions and family members.
  • Gene expression profiles. Integrating information regarding general health status is considered essential to ensure accuracy in multigene prognostic models.
  • Neoadjuvant systemic treatment options. Fit older patients should be considered for neoadjuvant systemic therapy similar to younger women. Less fit older patients are considered best served by surgery upfront that could enable systemic treatment de-escalation based on pathological findings.
  • Bone-modifying drugs. Since bone health is affected by systemic treatments for early breast cancer, baseline assessment and monitoring is recommended for older women, with adjuvant bisphosphonates offered to those found to have moderate to high risk of disease.
  • Targeted therapy. CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy represent a suitable treatment in older patients with frequent adjustments needed; however, everolimus should be approached with caution and on a case-by-case basis due to its worse safety profile in older patients.
  • Supportive care. Due to increased physiological vulnerability and decreased functional reserve, older patients are at risk of decompensation while receiving cancer treatment.  Particular care should be paid to digestive symptoms, malnutrition, pain control and depression, with older patients also more susceptible to changes in medications, side-effects and drug interactions.
Total
54
Shares
Share 54
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • breast cancer
  • chemotherapy toxicity risk calculator
  • frail
  • functional age
  • geriatric assessment
Janet Fricker

Janet Fricker is a medical writer specialising in oncology and cardiology. After researching articles for Cancerworld she runs, swims, and eats porridge.

Previous Article
  • News

Ovarian cancer population screening study signals need for additional biomarkers

  • 18 May 2021
  • Janet Fricker
View Post
Next Article
  • Delivery of Care

Pain relief is a right: building confidence in opioid use in oncology

  • 20 May 2021
  • Sophie Fessl
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • News

Improving outcomes in elderly patients taking multiple medications

  • Janet Fricker
  • 24 March 2023
View Post
  • News

Localised prostate cancer: active monitoring offers valid option

  • Janet Fricker
  • 24 March 2023
View Post
  • News

Radiotherapy can be safely omitted in older women with low-risk breast cancer

  • Janet Fricker
  • 10 March 2023
View Post
  • News

Plant-based diets cut risk of prostate cancer progression and recurrence by over 50%

  • Janet Fricker
  • 9 March 2023
A blood test to recognize prostate cancer
View Post
  • News

New prostate cancer blood test combining PSA with epigenetic test could reduce biopsies

  • Janet Fricker
  • 23 February 2023
View Post
  • News

Telomere shortening mediates tumour suppression

  • Janet Fricker
  • 23 February 2023
View Post
  • News

Epidemiological study sheds light on complex link between ovarian cancer and ovulation

  • Janet Fricker
  • 9 February 2023
View Post
  • News

Cancer could overtake cardiovascular disease as leading cause of death in type 2 diabetes

  • Janet Fricker
  • 9 February 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

search
or search in Cancerworld archive
Newsletter

Subscribe free to
Cancerworld!

We'll keep you informed of the latest features and news with a fortnightly email

Subscribe now
Latest News
  • Improving outcomes in elderly patients taking multiple medications
    • 24 March 2023
  • Localised prostate cancer: active monitoring offers valid option
    • 24 March 2023
  • Radiotherapy can be safely omitted in older women with low-risk breast cancer
    • 10 March 2023
  • Plant-based diets cut risk of prostate cancer progression and recurrence by over 50%
    • 9 March 2023
  • A blood test to recognize prostate cancer
    New prostate cancer blood test combining PSA with epigenetic test could reduce biopsies
    • 23 February 2023
Article
  • ‘Fragile’ cancer patients hit by Turkish earthquake need urgent support
    • 22 March 2023
  • Expert cancer surgery: could VR help speed up and standardise training?
    • 22 March 2023
  • Immunotherapy: three studies point to potential strategies to improve response
    • 10 March 2023
Latest printed issue
Social

Would you follow us ?

Contents
  • AI in Surgery
    • 8 March 2023
  • COVID and haematological malignancies
    • 28 February 2023
  • Telemedicine Rehabilitation in the Cancer Care Continuum
    • 24 February 2023
MENU
  • About the Magazine
    • Editorial Team
    • Leadership and Management
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • Archive
    • Contacts
  • Articles
    • Policy
    • Practice Points
    • Delivery of Care
    • Biology basic
    • Medicine
    • Featured
  • Contents
    • News
    • Editorials
    • Interviews to the Expert
    • In the Hot Seat
    • Profiles
    • Obituaries
    • Voices
    • Partnerships
    • Supported contents
  • Media Corner
    • Journalist Cancer Guide
    • Cancer Journalism Award
    • Cancer Journalist Grant
Cancerworld Magazine
  • About the Magazine
  • Articles
  • Media Corner
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Cancerworld is published by SPCC Sharing Progress in Cancer Care | Via Vincenzo Vela 6, 6500 Bellinzona - Switzerland | info@spcc.net

Archivio Cancerworld

Input your search keywords and press Enter.